bioethics.com
home |  about |  contact |   
your global information source on bioethics news and issues
Bioethics 101
Categories


WWW
Bioethics.com
Authors
Archives
Recommended Reading

November 18, 2007

Just Because Someone Wants Something, Does That Mean Doctors Should Do It?

The cultural ethic of “choice ubber alles” is growing increasingly radical. We have seen previously, that a few bioethicists have advocated that doctors be permitted to cut off healthy limbs of people suffering from Body Identity Integrity Disorder (BIID), also known as “amputee wannabe.” People with the mental illness want to have one or more limbs amputated in order to be authentically themselves. There’s even a WEB site and an association seemingly dedicated to opening up the possibility of doctors cutting off healthy limbs of people obsessed with becoming amputees.

Now, doctors are suggesting that to avoid disease (or perhaps for other reasons), cloning and IVF procedures could be done so that a child had three biological parents.

From the story in the Sydney Morning Herald:

Controversial legislation due to be debated by politicians this week sets out ways to allow test-tube babies to be created from the biological material from three parents.

The laws would allow an embryo to be created from the nucleus of one woman’s egg, her partner’s sperm and another woman’s mitochondria, the material surrounding an egg’s nucleus and which promotes cell growth. The Independent on Sunday said if the controversial legislation was approved, babies created using the cloning technique could be born within the next decade…

There is much to say about this. First, just because a couple wants a baby and can’t have one without risking disease or to satisfy the desires of couples who both want to be the biological parents of offspring, but who could not otherwise be, doesn’t mean doctors should engage in extreme manipulation of gametes in the creation of embryos to accommodate them. Our sense of entitlement in the West to have whatever we want based on our desires alone, seems to know no bounds.
Second, and more urgently: Perfecting and applying this technique would amount to unethical human experimentation–and not only at the nascent stages. We know there is a slight adverse affect to health outcomes in regular IVF procreation. And that merely involves sperm meeting egg. We know that SCNT-cloning leads to terrible problems in animals born from the technique. Who knows what the consequences might be to the born child by having been stitched together, as it were, from three parents? Or indeed, potentially to the health of the birth mother?

Back when IVF was being developed, some warned that it would lead us to believe that we not only have the right to a baby, but to manufacture and manipulate our offspring so that he or she is the baby we want. Those voices were not Luddite, they were prophetic.

3 Responses to “Just Because Someone Wants Something, Does That Mean Doctors Should Do It?”

  1. Beverly Nuckols Says:

    We’ve been discussing ethics and conscience at LifeEthics.org, the Women’s Bioethics Blog and Bioethics.net. Now, the weekly email newsletter of the Christian Medical and Dental Association has dedicated an issue to the subject.

  2. Suricou Raven Says:

    I dont understand the church concerns. Why are they upset about ‘removing the need for a father,’ when the proposed procedure would merely result (if successful) in an embryo which gets half its chromosomes from an egg and half from a sperm cell? Its no different from conventional IVF in that regard: The sperm is still very much a needed component.

  3. Stacie Hill Says:

    This was being done regularly in America by Dr. Jaques Cohen until a few years ago (http://www.sbivf.com/). I heard him speak at a conference about the use of this technique. The mitochondria are the powerhouse of the cell, providing energy. Outside of the nucleus, it is the only known place to find DNA. The technique is to use the DNA from an older woman with the egg cytoplasm of a younger woman to produce a viable egg. The cytoplasm supplies the nutrients to the developing fertilized egg. This gives the embryo DNA from three sources.

Leave a Reply

 

The Bioethics Poll
Which area of research should more money be invested in:
Animal-Human Hybrids
Gene Thereapy
Reproductive Technology
Stem Cell Research
"Therapeutic" Cloning
None of the above


View results

Should there be a right of conscience for OB/GYN doctors?
Yes
No


View results
 
RSS
Bioethics Websites
home |  about |  contact |   
your global information source on bioethics news and issues