BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//bioethics.com - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:bioethics.com
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://bioethics.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for bioethics.com
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20240310T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20241103T070000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20250309T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20251102T070000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20260308T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20261101T070000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20250225T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20250225T130000
DTSTAMP:20260502T005144
CREATED:20250127T182741Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250127T182741Z
UID:95837-1740484800-1740488400@bioethics.com
SUMMARY:How Can a Patient Be Dead While Their Heart Still Beats? Addressing Ethical Challenges in the Determination of “Brain Death”/Death by Neurological Criteria
DESCRIPTION:The determination of a person’s death is an important process involving both medical and societal considerations. Controversy and confusion regarding the determination of death by neurologic criteria persist at the bedside\, in the community\, and within broader policy discussions. This leads to ethical dilemmas\, narrative misunderstandings\, and a lack of clarity that can result in both medical and moral harms. How can clinicians ensure death by neurologic criteria is determined ethically\, accurately\, and consistently? How should clinicians respond to patients’ and families’ unfamiliarity with the process of determining death? Specifically\, how should clinicians approach the concept of death by neurological criteria when patients and families may not be aware of\, or open to the concept? This session will review prevailing legal and medical standards for determining death\, and offer practical strategies for how to ethically approach conflict when death by neurological criteria is at issue. \nLearning Objectives: After this webinar\, attendees will be able to: \n\nDescribe the social importance of the meaning and determination of death\, and the two current legal standards for the determination of death\, either: 1) Circulatory or\, 2) Brain Death/Death by Neurological Criteria.\nDescribe the procedures for the determination of death by neurological criteria.\nIdentify strategies to address common ethical issues that arise in the determination of death by neurological criteria.\n\nSpeaker(s)\n\n\nMargy McCullough-Hicks\, MD\, is an Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of Minnesota and Affiliate Faculty at the Institute for Health Informatics. She is a vascular neurologist specializing in cerebrovascular disease and stroke neuroimaging and has a strong interest in clinical and research ethics. Dr. McCullough-Hicks earned her BA in Philosophy from Columbia University and her MD from Georgetown University. She completed a Neurology residency at Yale and a Vascular Neurology fellowship at Stanford. She is a member of the UMN Department of Neurology Diversity Equity and Inclusion Committee\, the University of Minnesota Medical Center Ethics Committee\, and the American Academy of Neurology Ethics\, Law\, and Humanities Committee. \nJoel Wu\, JD\, MPH\, MA\, HEC-C\, is a Center for Bioethics Clinical Ethics Assistant Professor and a senior lecturer in the Division of Health Policy and Management at the University of Minnesota’s School of Public Health.  He is a co-chair of the University of Minnesota Medical Center’s Ethics Committee\, co-lead for the clinical ethics consultation service for MHealth Fairview system hospitals\, and member of the MHealth Fairview Ethics Council. Professor Wu earned his BS in Biochemistry\, Genetics and Cell Biology\, and Microbiology\, and his MPH in Epidemiology from the University of Minnesota\, and his Masters in Bioethics and JD from Case Western Reserve University. He completed fellowships in Bioethics and Professionalism at the Mayo Clinic and in Clinical Ethics and Children’s Minnesota and Abbott Northwestern Hospital. He is a member of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network Ethics Committee.
URL:https://bioethics.com/event/how-can-a-patient-be-dead-while-their-heart-still-beats-addressing-ethical-challenges-in-the-determination-of-brain-death-death-by-neurological-criteria
LOCATION:Online
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20250225T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20250225T130000
DTSTAMP:20260502T005144
CREATED:20250213T153451Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250213T153451Z
UID:96210-1740484800-1740488400@bioethics.com
SUMMARY:The Growth of Dental Ethics as a Discipline
DESCRIPTION:Please join us for this online event on February 25\,2025 \nSpeaker: David T. Ozar\, Ph.D.  \nDavid T. Ozar\, an Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago\, has made significant contribution to dental ethics through his teaching\, founding of the American Society for Dental Ethics\, and extensive work with dental schools and professional societies\, while also authoring 153 ethics articles and three editions of “Dental Ethics at Chairside.” \nHis distinguished career has earned him numerous honors\, including Honorary Fellowships from the American College of Dentists and the American College of Legal Medicine\, as well as the American College of Dentists’ Ethics and Professionalism Award in 2018. \nLearning Objectives:  \n\nDescribe the main elements of the development of dental ethics as a discipline for teaching and learning since the 1980’s.\nExamine whether the discipline of dental ethics is adequately addressing\, in its teaching and learning\, the reality that professional formation is a process of life-long self-formation.\n\nDENTAL PROFESSIONALS CAN EARN 1ADA CERP CREDIT \nUniversity of Rochester\, Eastman Institute for Oral Health is an ADA CERP Recognized Provider. \nADA CERP is a service of the American Dental Association to assist dental professionals in identifying quality providers of continuing dental education. ADA CERP does not approve or endorse individual courses or instructors\, nor does it imply acceptance of credit hours by boards of dentistry. \nConcerns or complains about a CE provider may be directed to the provider or to the Commission for Continuing Education Provider Recognition at ADA.org/CERP.
URL:https://bioethics.com/event/the-growth-of-dental-ethics-as-a-discipline
LOCATION:Online
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR