New Issue of The American Journal of Bioethics is Now Available

April 25, 2011

The American Journal of Bioethics (Volume 11, Issue 4, April 2011) is now available by subscription only.

Articles include:

  • “The Research Subject as Identified Problem” by Paul Root Wolpe, 1-2.
  • “Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials” Sarah J. L. Edwards, 3 – 12.
  • “Contractual Duties in Research, Surrogacy, and Stem Cell Donation” by John A. Robertson, 13 – 14.
  • “Reevaluating the Right to Withdraw From Research Without Penalty” by G. Owen Schaefer and Alan Wertheimer, 14 – 16.
  • “The Case Against Contract: Participant and Investigator Duty in Clinical Trials” by Kenneth De Ville , 16 – 18.
  • “Dropout by Design: Advance Planning for Research Participant Noncompliance” by Toby Schonfeld and James Anderson, 18 – 20.
  • “Known Versus Unknown Threats to Internal Validity: A Response to Edwards” by Stephen Rice and David Trafimow, 20 – 21.
  • “‘Through a Glass Darkly’: Researcher Ethnocentrism and the Demonization of Research Participants” by John A. Lynch, 22 – 23.
  • “Can Contracts Enhance Participant Autonomy in Clinical Trials?” by Diana Buccafurni, 24 – 25.
  • “The Perspective of an IRB Member” by Stephen S. Hanson, 25 – 27.
  • “The Subject-Researcher Relationship: In Defense of Contracting Around Default Rules” by Michelle N. Meyer, 27 – 30.
  • “An Ethical Evaluation of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for HIV Testing in Health Care Settings” by M. Teresa Celada, Roland C. Merchant, Michael J. Waxman and Angela M. Sherwin, 31 – 40.
  • “The Re-Queering of HIV Testing Practices and the Reinforcement of Stigma” by Lance Wahlert and Autumn Fiester, 41 – 43.
  • “When Informed Consent Meets the Everyday” by William Smith, 43 – 45.
  • “Routine Opt-Out HIV Testing in Dental Health Care—Its Implementation and the Advancement of Public Health” by Anthony Vernillo, 46 – 48.
  • “Public Health Ethics and the Justification of HIV Screening” by Angus Dawson, 48 – 49.
  • “Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials” by Sarah J. L. Edwards,W1 – 3.

Posted by

Posted in Clinical / Medical, Journal Articles, Public Health, Reproductive Ethics, Research Ethics

Ad