New Issue of The American Journal of Bioethics is Now Available

May 4, 2011

The American Journal of Bioethics (Volume 11, Issue 5, April 2011) is now available by subscription only.

Articles include:

• “Beyond the IRB: Local Service Versus Global Oversight” by Molly Havard and David Magnus, 1 – 2.
• “Mobile Contact Tracing and Counseling for STI’s: There’s Not an App for That” by Summer McGee, 3 – 4.
• “Dealing With the Long-Term Social Implications of Research” by Alan Fleischman, Carol Levine, Lisa Eckenwiler, Christine Grady, Dale E. Hammerschmidt, and Jeremy Sugarman,5 – 9.
• “Power and Representation of the Public’s Values in a Social Implications of Research Commission” by John H. Evans, 10 – 11.
• “Challenges in a Divided Assessment of the Social Benefits and Risks of Research” by David Wasserman, 12 – 13.
• “The Role of Controversial Research in the IRB’s Risk/Benefit Analysis” John Lunstroth, 14 – 16.
• “Targeting Funding Sources: A Strategic Mechanism of Research Regulation” by Benjamin D. Schanker and Kchersti A. Ulvestad, 17 – 18.
• “The Need for Topically Focused Efforts to Deal with the Long-Term Social Implications of Research” by Frazier Benya, 19 – 20.
• “Designing a Disconnect?” by  Gladys B. White, 20 – 22.
• “IRBs and The Long-Term Social Implications of Research” by Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, 22 – 23.
• “Social Contexts Influence Ethical Considerations of Research” by Judith B. Gordon, Robert J. Levine, Carolyn M. Mazure, Philip E. Rubin, Barry R. Schaller, John L. Young, 24 – 30.
• “Social Considerations in Research: Consider Them but Don’t Use Them” by Dov Greenbaum and Mark Gerstein, 31 – 32.
• “Social Contexts, Social Media, and Human Subjects Research” by Mary Foulkes, 35 – 36.
• “Research Impacting Social Contexts: The Moral Import of Community-Based Participatory Research” by Ric Munoz and Mark D. Fox, 37 – 38.
• “An Ethically Justified Framework for Clinical Investigation to Benefit Pregnant and Fetal Patients” by Frank A. Chervenak and Laurence B. McCullough, 39 – 49.
• “Reframing the Framework: Toward Fair Inclusion of Pregnant Women as Participants in Research” by Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little and Ruth R. Faden, 50 – 52.
• “Moral Status and the Fetus: Continuation of a Dialogue” by Carson Strong, 52 – 54.
• “Emergent Obligations to the Former Fetal Research Subject” by Kenneth Kipnis,54 – 56.
• “Research in Pregnancy: Back to First Principles” by David I. Shalowitz and Jeffrey L. Ecker,56 – 57.
• “Community, Constituency, and Morbidity: Applying Chervenak and McCullough’s Criteria” by Geetha Shivakumar, Stephen Inrig and John Z. Sadler, 57 – 60.
• “The Common Rule, Pregnant Women, and Research: No Need to “Rescue” That Which Should Be Revised” by Chris Kaposy and Françoise Baylis, 60 – 62.
• “Who Is A Patient and Why Does It Matter?” by Ana S. Iltis, 62 – 64.
• “Unacceptable Risk in Pregnancy: Whose Choice and Responsibility?” by Constance Perry, 64 – 65.
• “The Two-Patient Framework for Research During Pregnancy: A Critique and a Better Way Forward” by Joan Liaschenko, Debra DeBruin and Mary Faith Marshall, 66 – 68.
• “Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Social Contexts Influence Ethical Considerations of Research” by Robert J. Levine, Judith B. Gordon, Carolyn M. Mazure, Philip E. Rubin, Barry R. Schaller, and John L. Young, W1 – 2
• “The Fetus as a Patient and the Ethics of Human Subjects Research: Response to Commentaries on “An Ethically Justified Framework for Clinical Investigation to Benefit Pregnant and Fetal Patients” by Laurence B. McCullough and Frank A. Chervenak, W3 – 7